Archive for April, 2004

Meet the Urosevich brothers

Thursday, April 29th, 2004

Via FARK.com (vanguard of free speech in America):

Meet the Urosevich brothers, Bob and Todd. Their respective companies, Diebold and ES&S, will count (using BOTH computerized ballot scanners and touchscreen machines) about 80% of all votes cast in the upcoming U.S. presidential election.

Regardless of the slant of the source on this one, the 2004 election is likely to be every bit as close as the one in 2000. Voter fraud and election tampering are a reality in America. This was true long before Diebold existed. Yet with the nation so evenly divided it has become easier than ever to manipulate the democratic process.

I fear the repercussions of a stolen election in a polarized America.

War: Take a good look

Monday, April 26th, 2004

War: Take a good look.

Anzac Day

Saturday, April 24th, 2004

At dawn on April 25, 1915 soldiers from Australia and New Zealand landed on the Gallipoli Peninsula. It was the beginning of one of the bloodiest battles in modern human history.

While our allies in the South Pacific remember those who gave their lives so long ago, we should consider the sacrifices being made by our own service members today.

Anzac Day is more than a day of remembrance; it is also a day of reflection. What is the nature of war? How does it come to be? Can it be avoided? And if not, can a war ever be truly won?

In this consideration we must be mindful of our history. Is our current situation in Iraq comparable to Vietnam as some claim? Perhaps, but I think the Bush Administration’s broader global, generational war on terror is much more like World War I than any conflict since.

Terrorists – both state sponsored and otherwise – have attacked nations, and our nations have responded in the only way they know how. The aftermath of World War I saw the Middle East reshaped by the West; Something the Bush Administration would very much like to see happen again. But at what cost?

As our troops are fighting and dying today – nearly a century after “the war to end all wars” – are we as a race any closer to knowing the peace our ancestors thought they were fighting for?

Like a thief in the light

Saturday, April 17th, 2004

The National Archivist is the custodian of American history. The head of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is tasked with preserving “precious and irreplaceable national treasures.” (Things like presidential documents, State Department e-mails, and the 9/11 Commission’s research and findings.) Naturally – given the potential that should the archivist be appointed “arbitrarily, or motivated by political considerations, the historical records could be impoverished [or] even distorted” – it is vitally important that the right person be selected for the post.

To that end, since NARA became an independent agency in 1985, the process of nominating a National Archivist has been open for “public discussion and input.” Meaning that other archivists, researchers, and historians have done their best to lobby against the selection of archivists who might – for whatever reason – impede access to politically sensitive national records. Fortunately, the American people will no longer needlessly suffer this scourge of transparency in government.

“On April 8 the Bush Administration quietly pushed the current archivist, John Carlin, a Clinton appointee, to step down. To replace him, Bush will nominate Allen Weinstein, a historian who has been criticized for failing to abide by accepted scholarly standards of openness”.

People have put forward several theories as to why the Administration has taken this unusual step. One is that the White House is out to protect dad’s “legacy” by having their man on the scene to manage access to Bush 41’s documents set to be released to the Archive in January 2005. Another theory concerns the Administration’s desire to limit access to the records collected and produced by the 9/11 Commission later this year. And then there’s my theory.

In addition to being the gatekeeper of the whats, wheres, whens, whys, and whos of our government, the National Archivist has another responsibility. I’ll explain.

While you and I are busy making hanging chads in November the REAL voters – those elite few known as the Electoral College – will be…well, they’ll probably be sitting on their asses enjoying their inherited lives of wealth and privilege however they damn well please. They won’t get together to decide who the 44th President of the United States of America will be until December 13th. We’re all taught in civics class that the electors are supposed to vote according to the outcome of the popular vote in their respective states, but “there is no Constitutional provision or Federal law” requiring this.

After the 538 electors vote, the governors of the 50 states (and the mayor of DC) send the Certificates of Ascertainment to NARA…by registered mail. Yup. Registered mail. I won’t even bother with that one.

And that’s where Bush’s hand-picked National Archivist comes in.

Now if one were to say – oh I don’t know – attempt to rig a presidential election, which would be easier: Tampering with the popular vote in thousands of precincts nationwide, or just waiting until 51 Certificates of Ascertainment are in one envelope, on the desk of one man?

Delusional fantasy? Yeah, in a sane world.

IBM IT Manager sim

Friday, April 16th, 2004

Via Metafilter:

The IBM IT Manager sim. A nifty little game promoting the latest and greatest IBM office-space must haves.

Registration is required – although it accepts fake e-mail addresses – and you can only play once per day per registration. Kind of lame that. Otherwise, as pointed out by dejah420 over at mefi, aside from the fact that women do not exist in IBM’s ideal IT world the game is pretty cool. Plus you can use it to train your own replacement in Bangalore!